All agreements are not contracts. Only that agreements which is enforceable at law is a contract. An agreement which is enforceable at law cannot be contract. Thus, the term agreement is more wider in scope than contract. All Contracts are agreements but all agreements are not contracts.
An agreement, to be enforceable by law, must posses the essential elements of a valid contract as contained in section 10 of the Indian Contract Act. According to Section 10, "All agreements are contract if they are made by the free consent of the parties, competent to contract, for a lawful consideration and with a lawful object and are not expressly declared to be void." As the details of these essentials form the subject-matter of our subsequent chapters, it is proposed to dismiss them in brief here.
The following are the essential elements of a valid contract :
1. Offer and Acceptance. In order to create a valid contract, there must be a 'lawful offer' by one party and 'lawful acceptance' of the same by the other party.
2. Intention to Create Legal Relationship. In case, there is no such intention on the part of parties, there is no contract. Agreements of social or domestic nature do not contemplate legal relations.
Case :- Balfour vs. Balfour(1919)
3.Lawful Consideration. Consideration has been defined in various ways. According to Blackstone,"Consideration is recompense given by the party contracting to another." In other words of Pollock, "Consideration is the price for which the promise of the another is brought."
consideration is known as quid pro-quo or something in return.
4. Capacity of parties. The parties to an agreement must be competent t contract. If either of the parties does not have the capacity to contract, the contract is not valid.
According the following persons are incompetent to contract.
(a) Miners, (b) Persons of unsound mind, and
(c) persons disqualified by law to which they are subject.
5. Free Consent. 'Consent' means the parties must have agreed upon the same thing in the same sense.
According to Section 14, Consent is said to be free when it is not caused by-
(1) Coercion, or (2) Undue influence, or (3) Fraud, or
(4) Mis-representation, or (5) Mistake.
An agreement should be made by the free consent of the parties.
6. Lawful Object. The object of an agreement must be valid. Object has nothing to do with consideration. It means the purpose or design of the contract. Thus, when one hires a house for use as a gambling house, the object of the contract is to run a gambling house.
The Object is said to be unlawful if-
(a) it is forbidden by law;
(b) it is of such nature that if permitted it would defeat the provision of any law;
(c) it is fraudulent;
(d) it involves an injury to the person or property of any other;
(e) the court regards it as immoral or opposed to public policy.
7. Certainity of Meaning. According to Section 29,"Agreement the meaning of which is not Certain or capable of being made certain are void."
8. Possibility of Performance. If the act is impossible in itself, physically or legally, if cannot be enforced at law. For example, Mr. A agrees with B to discover treasure by magic. Such Agreements is not enforceable.
9. Not Declared to be void or Illegal. The agreement though satisfying all the conditions for a valid contract must not have been expressly declared void by any law in force in the country. Agreements mentioned in Section 24 to 30 of the Act have been expressly declared to be void for example agreements in restraint of trade, marriage, legal proceedings etc.
10. Legal Formalities. An oral Contract is a perfectly valid contract, expect in those cases where writing, registration etc. is required by some statute. In India writing is required in cases of sale, mortgage, lease and gift of immovable property, negotiable instruments; memorandum and articles of association of a company, etc. Registration is required in cases of documents coming within the scope of section 17 of the Registration Act.
All the elements mentioned above must be in order to make a valid contract. If any one of them is absent the agreement does not become a contract.
i have learned this page it is easy and simple to understand
ReplyDeleteit is easy to understand
ReplyDeleteReally its very good and understandable
ReplyDeletereally its good...law in a very simple language....
ReplyDeletereally its good...law in a very simple language....
ReplyDelete'WAO' I REALLY UNDERSTOOD YOU GUYS KEEP UP
Deleteits good and easily understandable. thank you
ReplyDeletePlease kindly assist me on this assignment. and answer to be forwarded to my mail box esfakolade@gmail.com.
ReplyDeleteQuestion: James an undergraduate age 19 went to a super market and order four Ipad Air, 2 Samsung Galaxy 4, and a wrist watch which he intend to present to his girl friend as a birthday gift. all these items were delivered to him at his hostel. James is the son of the college dean and has now refuse to pay the for the delivered items. Kindly advise the two parties.
Thank you all.
consideration must not be past so james is not bound to pay for the deliverance fee
Deletei think wat u should u consider first is.the contract was void because they did not agree upon each other
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThis page is very helpful and the language is very simple.
ReplyDeleteThe Second line in the first para the line "An agreement which is enforceable at law cannot be contract" is written wrong otherwise the content is good
agreed .
Deleteagreed .
Deletei am very grateful to this page because it gave us good content, precis and concise. thanks you so much for the offer and keep it up.
ReplyDeletei am very grateful to this page because it gave us good content, precis and concise. thanks you so much for the offer and keep it up.
ReplyDeleteThank you! This really helped me!
ReplyDeleteLinda sells a TV cabinet to Cathy. Linda tells Cathy that it is a vintage one of only three cabinets manufactured in the world when TV was first introduced. She further tells Cathy that the cabinet is set to be worth R50 000 due to its unique shape and age. When Cathy insured the cabinet the insurance company informed her that it is a virtually worthless second-hand cabinet which is one of over 10 million manufactured in China.
ReplyDelete2.1. Discuss whether there was a valid offer and acceptance between Linda and Cathy.
this is misrepresentation and fraud and hence this was not a valid contract.
DeleteThere is no free consent.. Between two so void contract
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThank you! This really helped me!
ReplyDeletei real enjoy te great notices
ReplyDeleteIt's easy understand.
ReplyDeleteit saved my time thanks a lot
ReplyDeleteReally help make my life easy thanx alot
ReplyDeletethanks........it short and clear
ReplyDeletePlenty thanks to u guys
ReplyDeletePlenty thanks to u guys
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteeasily gets through my mind
ReplyDeleteIn a court case, party A alleged that party B had given him an option to buy his
ReplyDeletefarm for £4 000 and that B thereafter wrongfully cancelled the option, causing
A to suffer damages. B’s defence was that there was no legally binding
agreement as A had not given anything in return for being granted the option.
The appellate division rejected B’s defence and held that this was indeed an
agreement which had been seriously and deliberately made.
1. Discuss the doctrine of valuable consideration and iusta causa with
reference to the above case (by name). Also discuss which of the two
doctrines the South African law has adopted
Please assist
Thanku guys for your Support
ReplyDeleteYeah ! This English very simple !
ReplyDeleteଆସନ୍ତା କାଲି ଆମୋ 卐ଶ୍ରୀ ଶ୍ରୀ ଗଣେଶମ୍ ଚତୃର୍ଥି ! ଆପଣମାନଙ୍କୁ ଆମୋର ଶୁଭ କାମନା ଜଣାଉଛୁ ।।
ReplyDeleteThanks for the help with the that reference
ReplyDeleteToo good explanation
ReplyDeleteThanks... good explanation.. it is very helpful
ReplyDeleteHeah ! How is jurisdiction determined in case of email contracts?
ReplyDeleteDidn't know that a "miner" could not contract - see 4(a)
ReplyDeleteHowever,I do know that a minor cannot.
Very Nice Information !!
ReplyDeleteThanks for sharing a informative information.
Outline Company Incorporation
“A” bought a motor car from “B” at Rs. 4, 00,000 with a belief that car was not seriously
ReplyDeleteaccidental. “A” trusted in “B” and bought the car and found that car was perfectly fine. After a
time, “C” offered to buy A’s car with the assurance that the car would be in a good condition. C
bought A’s car for. 3, 25000. Later, “C” discovered that the car was seriously accidental. He
immediately filed a suit against “A” with one of the reasons that he had committed a deliberate
fraud with him. While on the other hand, “A” gave explanation that he was also completely
unaware about that accident and had not committed any fraud as he found no signs of accident
when it was purchased from “B”.
Required
1. Who was involved in fraudulent activity A, B or C. support your answer with some logical
reasons?
2. Who had misrepresented A, B or C and provide justifications.
3. In this situation what should C do?
plz answer this question???????
Thank you so much for enlighten the readers with such clearity about the topic. Really appreciated. RESPECT ☺
ReplyDeleteThank you so much for enlighten the readers with such clearity about the topic. Really appreciated. RESPECT ☺
ReplyDeletethank you..... its very useful to me...
ReplyDeleteThanks... I really appreciate that guys.... Nice explanation, simple language, but in our country we only study 5 essential elements of contract...
ReplyDeleteThose poor "Miners"!
ReplyDeleteThose poor "Miners"!
ReplyDeleteOnly that agreements which is enforceable at law is a contract. An agreement which is enforceable at law cannot be contract.
ReplyDeleteAND WHAT IS THAT SUPPOSE TO MEAN?
Only that agreements which is enforceable at law is a contract. An agreement which is enforceable at law cannot be contract.
ReplyDeleteAND WHAT IS THAT SUPPOSE TO MEAN?
Thanks for this article ... Sorry may you explain more the concept of VOID with respect to contract?
ReplyDeleteAppreciate the clarity,simplicity and easy to follow type presentation of the article.I would like to know-Will an agreement be void because it is not Registered at Registrar's office?M.B.Deshpande.
ReplyDeleteoyyy
ReplyDeleteThis is very much easy to understand.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteCheat code for keeping in mind all the points:-
ReplyDeleteOIL
CFL
CPN 😜
Hope u all find it useful..
Cheat code for keeping in mind all the points:-
ReplyDeleteOIL
CFL
CPN 😜
Hope u all find it useful..
Thanks for this article, good explanation. It is very helpful for understanding essential elements of a valid contract.
ReplyDeleteHae,help me out
ReplyDeleteAll contracts are agreement but not all agreement are contracts,help me plz(20mks)
Send through email
Sammynjorogem360@gmail.com
awsome explantation .. perfectly defined with spefic sections of Indian Contract Act 1872 .
ReplyDeletetq admin
Bht bhdiya h mene top mrdiya hai law me 1st sem me...
ReplyDeleteThank you people for the support.
ReplyDelete